This time though:
Rank Name Elo + - games score draws
1 Mediocre 1.0 -2 31 29 28 100 60% 31%
2 Mediocre 1.0 -1 -31 28 29 100 41% 31%
So in worst case 2 elo better, in best case 60 (the -2 refers to futility pruning added to that version). But somewhere around 30 elo is probably accurate.
Combining this with the test last night would give this:
Rank Name Elo + - games score draws
1 Mediocre 1.0 -2 53 39 38 100 60% 31%
2 Mediocre 1.0 -1 -11 12 12 1100 53% 24%
3 Mediocre v0.34 -42 13 13 1000 46% 24%
Probably flawed to bits with no statistical significance. But I wonder if I can't say that Mediocre has gained somewhere upwards of almost 100 elo.
Probably not, but considerably better it is.
On to internal iterative deepening.
Hi Jonatan, good to see you progress. Don't worry much about the absolute ELO gain. Running matches of A vs A' is usually good to prove whether one version is stronger than the other. But in my experience the ELO difference from that is over estimated. You need matches against a set of other opponents for that. It seems you will have a strong engine when Chess War starts division E. Keep it up !
ReplyDeleteThomas...